Automatic safe engine block on theft
Remote immobilisation via the platform assumes the thief drives through coverage and someone is watching the screen. Jammers defeat it. Your customer wants the vehicle to defend itself.
How the logic runs
The algorithm watches for theft indicators — movement/coordinate change without authorisation (combine with the engine-authorization pattern).
Theft condition met → the block arms, but the engine is NOT cut while moving.
Once the vehicle stops, the output switches and the engine is blocked from restarting.
The event and location log to your platform when connectivity allows — but the block itself needed none.
A jammer kills tracking, not the algorithm. The blocking decision was already on the vehicle; the thief drives it to a stop once and it stays stopped.
- Automatic safe engine blocking as antitheft protection
- Remote locking and unlocking of the central lock
Proven templates from the Easy Logic library — we commission and adapt them to your fleet.
Straight answers
Is cutting the engine while driving not dangerous?
The template blocks only after the vehicle stops — that's why it's called safe engine blocking. Moving vehicles are never cut.
Does a GSM jammer defeat it?
Jamming blocks communication, not on-device logic. The algorithm runs regardless; only the notification waits for coverage.
Can we also drop the central locking remotely?
Yes — remote central-lock control is a separate template and can be combined.
Want this running on your fleet?
Describe the operation — we quote the hardware and commission the algorithm with you. Stock in Johannesburg, no MOQ.